Author: Ryan

  • Writers who shouldn’t write superheroes

    The direct market in North America is primarily built around superheroes, so it’s inevitable that most writers and artists who want to make a living have to work in the genre at least occasionally. Unsurprisingly, not all writers are terribly well suited to it, even those who are otherwise highly skilled.

    Peter Milligan: Milligan’s written some superhero-based material – X-Statix was a solid satire with heart, and Enigma had some interesting ideas about the genre – but for the most part he just can’t play it straight enough to pull off a mainstream superhero book. They might not be bad, but they’re certainly not up to his usual standards, and usually just disappoint his fans and piss off fans of the book and characters. Milligan often writes with a wink and a nudge – you know this stuff is silly, right? – that isn’t appreciated by audiences who take their franchises very silly.

    Neil Gaiman: Both 1602 and Eternals seem billed as “Neil Gaiman does superheroes”, which isn’t a terribly good use of either the writer or the characters and concepts. Gaiman likes his stories full of characterization and obscure mythology and literature; Sandman may have its roots in the genre, but it quickly evolved into something else. He can do superheroes, of course – some days I think he could do absolutely anything – but it just seems like such a waste of his talents.

    Greg Rucka: Queen & Country is a fantastic book. Gotham Central was pretty good, even if Rucka seems to be replicating his “tough and self-destructive female protagonist” bit too much. Everything else he writes runs the gamut from “okay” to “bleah.” He’s good at gritty, real-world stories, an approach that’s all right on Batman or Wolverine but still doesn’t do enough with the concept, and downright boring on something like Superman. Even the politics and espionage suffer in his superbooks: OMAC Project was an unreadable mess, and Checkmate feels like a dumbed-down Q & C further weighed down by DCU trivia.

    Warren Ellis: Aside from Nextwave, which is more about poking superheroes with a stick, and Authority, which was about giving traditional superheroes the finger, Ellis’ superhero work seems so uninspired: Like Milligan’s work, it might not be bad, but you can’t help reading it and thinking “this should be so much better.” I’m not sure if it’s entirely the genre, or if Ellis has simply grown dispassionate about books he doesn’t own; newuniversal should be an interesting experiment, mixing the sci-fi weirdness he loves with some tweaked genre conventions.

    Garth Ennis: Duh.

  • That ain’t good

    According to the October sales ranking, Wildcats #1 was the 14th best-selling comic in the direct market.

    That’s got to be pretty disappointing: Jim Lee, Grant Morrison, a variant cover by Todd McFarlane, a much-hyped relaunch of a once-successful property created by one of the hottest artists of the past decade… and it gets you 14th? Obviously Civil War and 52 are eating up the market, but that’s a disappointment any way you look at it.

    The rest of the Wildstorm relaunch isn’t doing so hot, either: The first issue of The Authority comes in at #27, Gen 13 debuts at #34, Deathblow #1 places 51st, and the second issue of Wetworks slides all the way down to #68.

    All the big names and hype appear to have accomplished very little, and most of these titles are bound to slide down the charts with their second issues; the delays to Wildcats and Authority can’t help. And unless they see strong TPB sales – something I can only see happening for Authority and possibly Deathblow – I wonder if this will be Wildstorm’s last kick at the can.

  • The Most Important Comics Ever Published

    Or, My Life in Comics. These aren’t by any means the best comics I’ve ever read, but some of the most important in terms of what I read now and why I read them at all.

    ROM #59 – October 1984

    This is the first comic I ever remember buying (or, at least, having bought for me, since I was only 7). Rom and his sidekick, Starlight, shrink down to microscopic size (with help from Ant-Man) in order to fight evil bacteria on an ant. I think. I haven’t read it in a long time, nor do I really plan to; some childhood memories shouldn’t be revisited.

    Still, this is the kind of awesome, crazy sci-fi fantasy we don’t see as much in comics today, and it was pretty impressive, particularly to a 7 year-old. I read a few Rom comics after that – though I never read the beginning or end of this particular story. One of the things I really remember about the book was an ad for Jim Starlin’s Dreadstar on the back cover: It looked like the coolest thing ever to a kid who thought Star Wars was the greatest film ever made. I’ve still never read it.

    Uncanny #209-210 – September 1986

    Kicking off an almost decade-long obsession, these two books came in a pre-sealed package I think I got in a departments store on a family trip to Florida. There was also a pack that included a couple issues of Alpha Flight which were less significant in every possible sense.

    #209 is the second part of a fight with super-sentinel Nimrod, who proceeds to beat the crap out of most of the X-Men and the Hellfire Club, until Shadowcat helps Colossus escape being buried alive and deliver a serious smackdown on the robot. There’s also a subplot about Rachel wandering around a weird amusement park after being gutted by Wolverine, which didn’t make much sense considering I hadn’t read the previous issue. Wolverine himself doesn’t do a heck of a lot here – he frightens off a bunch of Hellfire goons. But it was pretty obvious he was cool.

    #210 is a pretty stark contrast as the X-Men recover from the fight in one of Claremont’s typical slowdown issues. It spent a lot of time discussing past events and hinting at future ones – it leads into the Mutant Massacre – but was much more mellow and in-depth than any comic I’d read before. I knew this was good stuff, and I wanted to read more.

    Sandman special #1 – 1991

    For the longest time, I read superhero comics. Lots of them. Mostly X-Men and Marvel books, but I wandered every now and then. Eventually, I heard people talking about the Sandman thing, and even though no one ever seemed to adequately describe what it was about, it sounded cool.

    I found myself looking at this issue – complete with a glow-in-the-dark cover by Dave McKean that’s actually kind of cool – and picked it up, and it’s as good a starting point for Sandman as anything else: Since I’ve always liked Greek mythology, the story of Orpheus was an obvious winner, and the sequence in Death’s modern-day apartment was confusing yet enticing. Throw in some nice Bryan Talbot art and a bunch of scary naked women and we had a definite winner. Soon after I started the main series in the middle of Brief Lives, which confused the heck out of me in the best way possible.

    Archer & Armstrong #0 – July 1992

    Along with Sandman, this is one of the books that opened my eyes to the possibility of doing books about something other than super heroes. Archer & Armstrong may be kind of a superhero book, but not entirely: No costumes (aside from the Unity crossovers), and less fighting evil than bumbling from one story to the next. The basic plot of this issue features Archer being almost murdered by his pervert parents, learning martial arts in the middle east, then starting a fight in a bar with a man he’s told is the devil. I’d never read anything quite like it before – nor since, to be perfectly honest – and I was hooked. The awesome Barry Windsor-Smith artwork was a big plus, too: Distinct and memorable, yet cool.

    Johnny the Homicidal Maniac #1 – 199?

    Wherein I dip my feet into the world of small publishers. This came out originally in 1995, but the copy I bought was an 8th printing or something, so I probably read it in 98 or 99. I was reading comics only sporadically, having gone off to university and discovered alcohol and women, but stumbled across this in a comic store. It was pretty awesome: Morbid and funny and totally nonsensical. Nowadays I prefer Jhonen Vazquez’ work on Squee or I Feel Sick, but this made a huge impact and led me to Lenore and the rest of Slave Labor’s awesome output.

    X-Force #116 – May 2001

    It’d been a long time since I’d read comics regularly. The late nineties mostly sucked, and I’d found other things to spend my limited funds on. I’d pick up a book here and there, but nothing regularly. That all changed when I walked into a store to browse one day and saw one of the most unexpected comics ever: Mike Allred drawing X-Force.

    Madman doesn’t have a place on this list, but it’s still one of the most enjoyable superhero comics ever; Allred’s got a tremendous sense of fun and adventure, and a great clean and expressive style. X-Force brought back memories of Rob Liefeld and polybagged comics full of totally extreme and generic hyper-vigilantes. So the combination was kind of unholy. Throw in Peter Milligan, a guy I was familiar with (but didn’t revere as I do now), and you had a winner. This was a great, funny take on superheroes, and largely redeemed a company and industry I’d almost written off as marketing hype whores. I didn’t think Marvel was capable of putting out a book with this much originality, but they proved me wrong.

    X-Force led to New X-Men, which led to coming back to the store regularly to buy more and more books. And that’s where we are now: Spending too much money on comic books.

    Damn you, Rom. It’s all your fault.

  • I am no longer worried

    I was kind of bummed that Cully Hamner was leaving Blue Beetle, since he had the perfect style for the book.

    But the new guy, Rafael Albuquerque, is looking pretty awesome. Perhaps most importantly, he seems to be drawing the teenage cast as teenagers. Look – different characters have different body types! Yay.

    John Rogers writing solo didn’t worry me, since his solo-penned #7 was the best issue of the series. Now it looks like the art will be in good hands too, particularly if if can avoid some of the last-minute fill-ins the book has seen.

    Good book. Go buy.

  • Timewarp Casting: Wolverine

    Hugh Jackman was okay. He made a perfectly good Wolverine, even if he’s a bit too pretty and tall for it. And too Australian.

    But the guy who was made to play Wolverine – even if he was born 40 years before the character was created – has got to be Tatsuya Nakadai.

    Yes, he’s Japanese. But look past that.

    Toshiro Mifune gets most of the (well deserved) credit as the king of Japanese cinema, particularly the chambara and jidaigeki samurai films. But Nakadai, who often played opposite Mifune, may have been the real badass. Unlike Mifune, he seldom chewed up scenery, and he conveyed a lot of his attitude silently. Just watch him playing henchmen in Yojimbo or Sanjuro: He doesn’t say much, but he’s got those creepy and intense eyes.

    Nakadai shows off his Wolverine credentials in his solo films: Goyokin, Harakiri, and Sword of Doom. Goyokin was the first that really opened my eyes to the potential: Nakadai portrays a master swordsman who exiled himself after watching his brother-in-law commit a massacre to cover up a gold heist. Solitary, silent, and scruffy, he just exhudes a “don’t mess with me” attitude.

    His “fallen samurai” role was one he had taken almost a decade earlier in Harakiri, where he played a samurai exposing corruption and hypocrisy in a noble house. Here, too, he’s got his tough guy attitude in abundance, as well as a solid helping of sneakiness and dry wit.

    No actor playing Wolverine should be without a psycho berserker side, something Nakadai shows off amply in the pitch-black Sword of Doom, playing a samurai prone to violence and bloodshed. Still laconic and solitary, he’s nonetheless prone to totally snapping and wiping out hordes of opponents; the closing sequence of the film is totally over-the-top, but also very Frank Miller-era Wolverine. Even the recent DVD cover could pass for a Wolverine cover with a few minor alterations:

    Nakadai’s got plenty of Mifune and Eastwood tendencies, but also mixes in a sense of genuine menace and occasional evil. While Mifune was always, ultimately, the good guy, Nakadai’s characters often had more moral ambiguity: Sword of Doom offers a guy who could be redeemed, but could also carry on being a complete psycho bastard.

    That’s the kind of actor you need for Wolverine. Mind you, you also need one who’s not in his seventies, sadly; although, if you watch the interviews he did for Criterion’s awesome Ran release, he could totally pass for 50. But as soon as someone invents a credible time machine or sophisticated cloning or de-aging techniques, Hollywood can make the perfect Wolverine film.

  • Sore Losers

    Somewhat balancing out my disappointment in last night’s municipal elections, we have the entertainingly bitter reactions from the right-wing Toronto Sun to the city voting in a left-wing mayor and heavily left-wing city council:

    • Christina Blizzard: “And welcome back to the People’s Republic of Toronto. Yep, here we are, along with that bastion of enlightenment — Cuba — the last outpost of socialism in an otherwise relatively enlightened Western world.”
    • Joe Warmington: “The Marxist leanings of so many councillors is a huge concern.”
    • Sue-Ann Levy: “[T]he same fawning Birkenstock-attired crowd who flocked to his victory party last night”, “slick socialist with the gift of the gab”, and “16 like-minded minions (including environentalist-lite Gord Perks in Ward 14) to City Hall to prop up the NDP agenda.”
    • And, in the main editorial: “Don’t say we didn’t warn you.”

    Losers. Nyah nyah.

    Fear not. A return to non-political content and mature discourse is imminent.

  • No, comic book fans aren’t creepy at all

    I’m not even going to comment on this.

    As a matter of fact, I don’t even recommend you read it. It will just make you feel dirty, angry, repulsed, or maybe simply pity for others. Or maybe superior to others. I think I’m leaning that way.

    Really, don’t go there.

    Here it is. It’s about Supergirl. And it’s at Newsarama. That’s all you need to know, right?

    (You went there, didn’t you? Even after I warned you? Shame.)

  • Democracy: What the fuck, dude?

    This probably isn’t of interest to anyone outside Toronto, or even outside Ward 29, but Case Ootes appears to have won his city council seat yet again in today’s municipal election.

    I am quite unhappy about this. To give you a very good indication of why I dislike the man, consider these comments he made on the subject of bicycle lanes in Toronto:

    I’m concerned about the overarching strategy of these activists in promoting bicycle lanes. They want to make it as difficult as possible for people to drive. I don’t think it will catch on.

    Motorists are suffering more and more frustration. There’s no way you can encourage motorists to get out of their cars to use a bicycle to commute to work. It’s just not going to happen.

    Yes, Case Ootes is a firm believer in “can’t win, don’t try.” It’s worth noting, for those of you not in the know, that Ward 29 is a very green and pedestrian-friendly riding, and still fairly close to downtown. I rode my bike pretty regularly when I worked downtown, and it usually took me less than half an hour. Ootes’ philosophy might make sense out in the suburbs, but not on the Danforth. The area is also serviced nicely by the subway and several buses that are usually full to capacity during rush hour. The Danforth is an area of the city that should be ideal of public transit, cycling, and pedestrians. It should be leading the way when it comes to clean environment and healthy citizens.

    It’s fairly obvious that many residents of Ward 29 agree, as more people voted against Ootes than for him. Unfortunately, they split the vote: Andrew James, who I genuinely like, received 518 votes – not enough to win, but enough to cost Diane Alexopoulos the victory. I hate the idea of strategic voting, and honestly believe that more people should vote based on who they want, not who they don’t, but this makes it tough. If James hadn’t run, or if fifty people had voted for Alexopoulos instead, we’d have a new city councilor tonight.

    On the up side, David Miller was re-elected mayor, and most of council remains fairly left-wing and green-friendly. Environmental activist Gord Perks even won a seat. Ootes will likely end up shouting about the poor, frustrated car owners to fairly deaf ears. And since he only won by 20 votes, there will probably be a recount, allowing for the possibility that he didn’t win.

    But for now, I’m pretty pissed. We deserve so much better.

  • Why go indie?

    Spurred on by this post over at the Newsarama Blog, I realize that yes, in fact, most indie comics do suck.

    Don’t get me wrong: I like many indie comics. It all depends, though, on what “indie” means, a question that gets asked frequently on message boards all across the web. The best consensus anyone can come to is “anything not Marvel, DC, Image, or Darkhorse”, but even the latter two companies act pretty indie at times, seeing how they have to operate in the cracks left by Marvel & DC’s stranglehold on the direct market. Of course, every now and then someone refers to Art Spiegelman or Marjane Strapi as “indie”, which seems fairly absurd given that they’re published by Random House.

    It’s just that the more “indie” you go, the suckier the comics seem to get. So, let me qualify my opening statement: Self-published comics suck.

    There are probably exceptions. But I haven’t found any, and I’m not terribly inclined to look very hard. Because most of the self-published, or “published by a very tiny publisher located in some guy’s basement in Saskatoon”, comics I’ve seen have been terrible. The art is often generic and clichéd, and the stories are usually recycled concepts that have been done a hundred times over. We really don’t need more stories about superheroes or zombies.

    The indie superhero market is particularly bizarre: Superhero fans are notoriously loyal to their properties. They don’t want superhero comics, or often even comics at all – they want the latest issue of X-men. I’m not even sure why DC continues to publish most of its Wildstorm titles, and those at least have a pedigree of star creators and used to be pretty hot stuff. Exactly why someone wants to publish a new superhero book when the superhero audience already has the books it wants completely escapes me.

    Even some of the recent bigger indie publishers have been pretty bland: Neither Alias nor Speakeasy offered much of interest, and it seemed the books that were promising didn’t get any press until they moved to other publishers.

    Even their websites are pretty sucky. Seriously: If you want to start up your own business, take a course in Dreamweaver or something. If you’ve got a tiny publisher with two books, there’s no reason for your site to be a cluttered mess that looks like a 13 year-old’s Myspace page.

    So why do people self-publish, or start their own company? In the purest, most altruistic sense, perhaps they’re really committed to the book and want to maintain complete control over it. As admirable as that is, it’s also problematic: Creators who are their own editors/publishers are seldom doing anyone any good. (cf. Robert Jordan)

    No, the main reason seems to be that people want to make comics but simply aren’t good enough to be accepted by existing publishers. Seriously: If your book is that good, why not pitch it to Oni or Slave Labor or Image or Drawn & Quarterly or Fantagraphics or IDW? These publishers put out a lot of very good books, and that gives them something no self-published comic can offer: A stamp of quality. Every book they publish may not be gold, but they’ve put out enough good books that I trust them to adhere to a certain level of quality.

    Oni & SLG in particular have very strong brand identities: I know what an Oni book is like. I know that these publishers have printed a lot of books I’ve liked, and that they’re likely to continue doing so. They may print some substandard crap from time to time, but it’s still crap I’m going to look at, if not buy. If New Indie Title looks like crap, I probably won’t give it a second look; New Oni Title may look like crap too, but I’ll probably at least flip through it because Oni usually knows what they’re doing.

    Granted, these publishers didn’t build up their reputations overnight. But in most cases, they started up with specific aims and ideas. They didn’t (as far as I know) start with the aim of publishing their own books – they found other people’s books that they believed in to publish. And they had vision, even in the early days, that they were filling a niche that wasn’t being serviced by other publishers. The first SLG book I ever picked up was a copy of Johnny The Homicidal Maniac, and as much as it’s kind of a juvenile philosophy-and-angst 101 comic, it still made a statement.

    Most comics are pretty much crap. Perhaps your hot new self-published book puts them all to shame. But if it’s really that good, why not work with an existing publisher? Why not let someone else handle the marketing and production while you concentrate on making the book as good as possible, ideally while working with editors and publishers who have worked on many good books? It just seems masochistic to do otherwise.

    On the other hand, maybe your idea really is just that good, and you’ve got a savvy and professional business plan to back it up. If that’s the case, then good for you – we need more comic publishers like that. But just take a look around and see if you can really compete with all the established companies out there: It’s a pretty high bar, and I’m only spending my money on the very best. If you think you’ve got the next Bone, you ought to sit down and consider just how awesome Bone was.

  • Pretty

    Newsarama has a nifty preview of Warren Ellis & Salvador Larocca’s newuniversal.

    It does kind of look like stereotypical Ellis, but at least the good stereotypical Ellis who enjoys what he’s doing, as opposed to the one who takes Ultimate gigs so he can afford to do the stuff he really wants to write.

    And while I admit to finding Larocca’s work pretty bland on X-Men (he and Peter Milligan were about the worst combination of talents I’ve seen in recent years), he’s really stepped it up here. If his name wasn’t on the book, I’m not sure I’d recognize it at all.

    Interesting looking book, and the preview hints at both some far-out sci-fi fantasy and some dark ‘n’ gritty super-vigilantism. Very promising, and near the top of my “books I can’t wait for” list. (note: I do not have an actual list)