Author: Ryan

  • More Broads! Down with Minx! (or not)

    It’s entirely possible to be too cynical.

    That will likely come as a startling admission to those who know me. Nonetheless, I’ve been fairly overwhelmed by the skepticisim and outright hostility that’s arisen out of DC’s announcement of their new line aimed at young girls.

    With any publicity and promotion, there’s going to be BS. And sure, the idea that a publisher is doing anything innovative or creative by marketing comic books to teenage girls is fairly silly, as evidenced by the growing number of publishers successfully. But it has to be expected: It might be more honest to say “We saw lots of other people making money off this audience and we wanted to get in on it”, but that’s just not going to happen.

    And yes, DC has enlisted a hot, teen-friendly marketing agency to help launch the books. While I’m naturally skeptical of anything to do with marketing and publicity, it nonetheless shows a commitment to the product that hasn’t always been seen when superhero publishers want to try something new. It certainly beats publishing the books and then hoping that 13 year-old girls wander into a comic shop while engaged in a scavenger hunt or something.

    Most of the hostility has surrounded the genders of the creators of the books: Only two female creators are involved in the line to this point, and one of them, Louise Carey, is co-writing with her more established father. Again, some cynicism is understandable, as it does seem a bit odd that there are so few women working on books targeted at a female audience.

    But in looking at what the line isn’t, many seem to have missed out on what it does have to offer: A group of very talented writers and artists, many of whom have already produced books that could be successfully marketed to the Minx demographic.

    Let’s start with Andi Watson. I’m having a hard time coming up with any creators, male or female, as perfect for this as Watson. This year alone he’s written Paris, a sweet love story, and written and drawn Little Star, a very cute story about a new father. Throw in Love Fights, even though it has superheroes, and you’ve got a writer who’s almost perfect for young adults. Also, his name kind of looks like he might be a woman; is that a plus?

    Mike Carey might be best known for his more mature Vertigo work and his increasing work with superheroes, but he’s also the author of My Faith In Frankie, which is just the sort of story I’d recommend to nearly anyone. That he’s teaming up with Frankie co-creator Sonny Liew for one of his Minx books is just icing on the cake.

    Throw in some art by Jim “Street Angel Totally Rocks” Rugg and Aaron “Serenity Rose is also pretty awesome” Alexovich and you’ve got a pretty talented lineup.

    Should there be more women among that talented lineup? Perhaps. But there aren’t all that many women (or men, it must be said) who are that good at writing this sort of material. Many of them, like Chynna Clugston and Hope Larson, have deals with other, larger publishers. There are plenty of women working at Tokyopop, but how many would be willing to abandon a publisher that’s already successfully selling to young women in bookstores for what is, at this point, still an expensive experiment on the part of a company that publishes predominantly superhero books?

    It’s possible that the lack of female creators working on these initial Minx books isn’t due to any institutional sexism, but simply the fact that nothing could be worked out at the time. I’m not so naive to believe that women can’t be sexists, but there’s nothing I’m aware of that would convict editors Karen Berger or Shelley Bond of this. They certainly haven’t shown any reluctance to hire women at Vertigo: Denise Mina is writing what is probably the Vertigo flagship, while Pia Guerra and Becky Cloonan are both drawing successful creator-owned books. Jill Thompson and Colleen Doran have both done plenty of high profile work for the imprint.

    It would be nice if there were more women working on the books, but barring evidence to the contrary, I’m content to believe that this is just the way things worked out for the time being. Minx is launching with bunch of very talented writers and artists who seem perfectly capable of producing work that would appeal to a young female audience. (Disclaimer: I am neither young nor female, and may be wrong completely. But I think Chynna Clugston would be perfect for it, too, and Scholastic clearly agrees with me. So there.) Perhaps this is the excuse of a sexist pig, but the fact Minx is hiring some of the best creators and spending a lot of money on promotion is good news, and the lack of female creators is merely an unfortunate coincidence.

    Amidst a lot of stupid crap, DC is doing something good, and they seem to be committed to doing it well. That deserves praise, not mockery.

    (Okay, a little bit of mockery. But get it over with and move on.)

  • Are you helping comics?

    So Jimmy Robinson’s piece You Are Not Helping Comics over at CSBG has resulted in a small bit of consternation.

    Robinson’s premise – though it’s hidden in a fairly rambling and unfocused column – is essentially that comics are awesome but comic fans should read everything, not jus a few select titles. Not only that, but they should take an active role in promoting the medium by recommending books to friends, family, and co-workers.

    He makes a pretty decent point. That the direct market is pretty fucked up is hardly a penetrating insight, but word-of-mouth marketing can be an incredibly effective tool. While some movies get massive advertising budgets, others have to start small and work their way up – Borat is probably the most profitable film of the year, and it didn’t receive anywhere near the promotion of a major studio release. It had its North American debut at the Toronto Film Festival’s Midnight Madness programme, which is typically home to underdog & low-budget films.

    Then again, I’m also skeptical of the “street teams” put together by some bands – particularly those targeting a young teen audience – that puts some of the advertising burden on its fans, encouraging them to request songs at radio stations and pimp the band on Myspace or whatever. Enlist a huge, occasionally influential group for the price of a few CDs and t-shirts? Somewhere between sleazy and brilliant.

    Still, I try: I recommend and loan books to friends, though I’ve only ever met with limited success; the only sure-thing convert I ever made was an ex-girlfriend. Most people react with interest, but seem unlikely to ever look for something on their own.

    But that’s neither here nor there, really. Robinson is right: Fans can help make comics more successful. It goes without saying that having a MySpace page and asking fans to friend you isn’t much of a marketing strategy, but every little bit helps.

    The main problem with Robinson’s argument, though, is where he talks about the diversity of the market. Of course, there is no diversity in the direct market. Most comic stores are happy to carry only Marvel & DC superhero books, along with the odd book based on a license from an 80s toy line. That’s not a terribly welcoming environment to new readers. It’s all very nice to ask retailers to carry a wider range of books, but I’ve heard plenty of stories about stores not ordering anything that deviates from their usual slate. What’s more, even if they do order a copy of Historical Indie Adventures, it’s more than likely to be one copy for that one customer; people who work on the assumption that comics=superheroes aren’t likely to change their belief system.

    And in this case, Robinson is not helping. I should say that I’ve never read anything by Jimmie Robinson before, so I have no opinion on whether he’s the next Alan Moore or the next Rob Liefeld. But on the face of it, his books don’t seem to be terribly diverse: Bomb Queen is probably one of the most stereotypically fanboy-ish books I’ve seen in a while, Tarot notwithstanding. And while he worries that “too many are walking lock-step to select titles and not taking advantage of everything comics has to offer”, he doesn’t seem afraid to cash in on the completist collector mentality by doing a What If: Wolverine book. I can’t blame him for wanting a solid paycheck, but let’s face it: He’s benefitting from the mentality he says is hurting comics.

    Robinson means well, and he’s obviously enthusiastic about the medium. That’s great, and I’m sure he’s a nice guy, regardless of the books he writes. But he doesn’t get his point across clearly, and he doesn’t seem like the right guy to be writing about diversity and the wide world of comics. He’s not hurting comics, but he doesn’t seem to be helping nearly as much as he wants everyone else to.

  • Superman Returns

    When Superman Returns gets it right, it really gets it right.

    Perhaps it’s my childhood fondness for the original films (I even liked Superman III), but as soon as the original theme music starts playing, I get all tingly. On can argue that Bryan Singer held Richard Donner’s original films in too high esteem, but you can’t blame him for being inspired by movies that really understood the heroism, romance, villainy, and comedy that makes the character so compelling. There are those who will tell you that Superman is too powerful and too perfect, but they’re wrong: Superman’s heroism and purity make him a great protagonist, as long as they’re balanced out by Clark Kent’s status as an outsider and perpetual second choice to the love of his life.

    So Singer gets the core of Superman: Accordingly, Superman Returns gives us a man who wants to do good, and who will be haunted by the fact he’ll never be able to save everyone; a guy who is loved by everyone, but always feels like he’s on the outside looking in. Brandon Routh pulls off the double role well: His Clark Kent is awkward, but not an outright nerd. His Superman has the requisite swagger of a man who can do almost anything. He’s still the good guy, but he knows he can be pretty awesome. His flirtation with Lois (“Richard takes me flying sometimes”; “Not like this.”) and the confrontation with the robber with the Big Bad Gun show off his acceptable levels of cockiness.

    Kevin Spacey’s Lex Luthor drew some criticism, but I can’t complain: He’s having fun. He’s a bit over the top at times, but he’s playing Lex Luthor, y’know? There’s a bit of Gene Hackman’s smarmy bastard in there, but slightly rabid. Spacey’s Luthor is a guy who was doing pretty well for himself at being underhanded and illicit until Superman came along, so it’s understandable he may have gone somewhat insane. Also, he gets Parker Posey as a sidekick; who can complain about that?

    Unfortunately, things start to get dicey with the decision to cast Kate Bosworth as Lois Lane. To star with the obvious, she’s just too young: Bosworth doesn’t look like she could have been a star reporter five years ago, let alone now. More importantly, she doesn’t act like it: Most of the time, Bosworth seems like someone who’s trying to look tough, not someone who is tough. She spends entirely too much time moping and mooning to be Lois Lane. While Margot Kidder didn’t take crap from anyone and did pretty much whatever she wanted, Bosworth seems to be playing the role of a teenager whose parents won’t let her have any fun.

    And then there’s the kid. I don’t dislike Jason as much as many people seemed to – for a child actor, he’s perfectly decent, and the idea of the character is interesting enough – but it feels like an unneeded addition to the already weighty film. The character of Richard, played ably by James Marsden, provides more than enough romantic and emotional tension: Singer avoided the obvious choice of having Lois hook up with a jerk that clearly didn’t deserve her. While Singer may have made Richard a bit too perfect (and a little bland), it’s a sensible decision compared to what he’s up against: No matter how perfect Richard is, he’s never going to measure up to Superman. But unlike Superman, we know he’s not the sort of guy who’s going to disappear for five years.

    Jason doesn’t really hurt the film, but he doesn’t add anything to it, either, and when a film breaks the two-hour mark, elements that aren’t necessary should be cut. Singer clearly liked the father-son idea, as evidenced by the opening monologue by Marlon Brando, but that’s explored enough by the fairly heavy Christ imagery. Superman Returns is a fine film, but begins to strain under the heavy weight Singer imposes in the final half-hour. While the first hour breezes along, and the confrontation with Lex Luthor is suitably tense, the final 45 minutes start to drag. Admittedly, this may be due somewhat to personal bias: When watching the film in the theatre, I really needed to go to the bathroom, but kept thinking “It’s okay, I can wait, it’s probably just another ten minutes.” That doesn’t pose quite the same problem when you’ve got a pause button, but the film could certainly do with some tougher editing.

    Bryan Singer gets Superman, and treats the character with the respect he deserves; though he’s not afraid to inject some humour, he stays away from camping things up or lowering the hero in order to make him more accessible. But he probably could have laid off a little: Between the Christ imagery and father-son themes, Singer’s vision can exceed his grasp at times. While some of the blame has to go to Bosworth’s lacklustre Lois, Singer’s tried to do too much, too fast with a franchise that’s spent too much time out of the public eye.

    Still, Singer has successfully resurrected Superman for the big screen, and he’s brought a lot of the magic and awe back to the franchise. Ambition and failure is always a more appealing mix than a successful mediocrity, so Superman Returns is appealing enough in that sense. A bit more editing and a stronger Lois Lane (whether Bosworth or someone else) and Singer, like Donner before him, could really hit it out with his second kick at the can.

  • The Lord of All Mankind doesn’t like Mondays

    … and neither do I.


    He’s obviously mighty and powerful, but he also looks kind of down. The captions say “I rule!” but the body language says “Can I go back to bed?” I feel the same way; sometimes it’s just too much of a chore to rule the Earth.

  • Let’s talk about how awesome I am

    There are many good movies out now.

    Volver has gotten some phenomenal reviews. The Fountain has got some great reviews and some absolutely atrocious ones, but it looks fascinating either way; it promises to be a spectacular and compelling failure, at the very least. And of course there’s Casino Royal, which allows me to see a James Bond film for the first time in a decade. (I have an intense allergic reaction to Pierce Brosnan.)

    But you know what I’m going to see this weekend?

    Happy Feet.

    Why? Because I am an awesome and understanding boyfriend.

    I’m sure Happy Feet is okay. It’s got some decent reviews. And it’s showing in IMAX, so that’s pretty cool. But it’s not, you know, a complex and experimental sci-fi philosophy film. It doesn’t have Penelope Cruz or stuff blowing up.

    See how awesome I am? If you’re dating me, anyway. If you’re not, then yeah, I suppose I kind of suck, because I’m going to watch a movie about penguins when there’s much cooler stuff to be seen.

    My sense of self-worth is fluctuating wildly right now.

  • Top Five Samurai Movies

    I’ve been alternately busy and lazy this week, so I haven’t put together a lot of useful content. But since they’re easy and kill time… a Top Five list!

    Samurai movies are great. There’s a lot of crap out there, of course, but the good stuff is really good. Inspired by American westerns, and in turn inspiring more American westerns as well as George Lucas, they’re full of action, drama, suspense, and some fantastic actors. For the record, I’m restricting the list the the “chambara” genre, which emphasized swordplay and action; films like Ran, Rashomon, and Throne of Blood don’t quite count as “samurai movies” in my book, even though they have samurai in them. Watch them anyway.

    1. The Seven Samurai: This one is obvious, and yes, it really is as good as everyone says. A group of peasants hire a band of down-on-their-luck samurai to protect their village from bandits. I could write several long posts on the film – and perhaps I shall eventually – but I’m not sure I could sell it any better. It’s got action, drama, comedy, and some tremendous performances by a great ensemble cast. Criterion recently reissued it in an amazing DVD set, so try to buy/rent that if you can. Seven Samurai also inspired The Magnificent Seven, if that helps to convince you.
    2. Samurai Rebellion: Masaki Kobayashi’s historical drama just qualifies for the list – it may be 90% drama, but the 10% action puts it over the top. Like the director’s Harakiri, it explores the ideas of honour and obedience to a lord. Toshiro Mifune plays an older samurai on the verge of retiring whose greatest concern is finding a wife for his son. All is good until the local lord orders his son to marry the lord’s former mistress, who has worn out her welcome. The girl is reluctantly taken in, and eventually wins the hearts of the family. But their happy life is broken up yet again when the lord changes his mind. Samurai Rebellion – originally released in Japan as Receive the Wife – is a slow-burning drama that gradually amps up the tension until it reaches a fierce and furious finale. The final confrontation between Mifune and an opponent will stick in your mind, as well as produce thoughts along the lines of “Hey, George Lucas really liked Samurai movies.”
    3. Goyokin: Probably the hardest on the list to find, though Amazon does have it available on DVD. Tatsuya Nakadai plays a master swordsman who undertook a self-imposed exile after watching his brother-in-law massacre a village in order to cover up a theft of the Shogun’s gold. When he hears rumours of a second attempt, he vows not to let another crime be commited. From the creepy opening shots of an abandoned village to the tense standoff at the finale, Goyokin is a lesser-known film that deserves to be a classic. It also deserves some credit for having a strong female role in the part of con-artist Ruriko Asaoka. It’s also in colour, in case you’re reluctant to dive into black & white.
    4. Sanjuro: This, along with Yojimbo, is probably the closest to a pure action movie Akira Kurosawa made. Toshiro Mifune glowers and menaces while reprising his ronin from Yojimbo, swaggering into a town in the midst of rebellion and tumult. A group of young and well-intentioned samurai are concerned about corruption, but the gruff and cynical Mifune shows them who the real villain is and how to stop him. It’s fairly light and fluffy by Kurosawa’s standards, but still entertaining. Criterion is also doing reissues of Sanjuro and Yojimbo that look quite nice.
    5. Kill!: Loosely adapted from the same source material as Sanjuro, this is something of a parody of Samurai film conventions. It’s no Spaceballs, even if you are familiar with the genre, but it’s nonetheless a lighter, funnier film. The corrupt village of Sanjuro receives two newcomers in this film: A down-on-his-luck ronin who just wants to gamble and relax, and an enthusiastic farmer who craves the dramatic and exciting life of the samurai. Tatsuya Nakadai deapans his way through most of the movie, toning down his fierce performances in Goyokin and Sword of Doom to an easy-going guy who just ended up in the wrong place at the wrong time. It’s a lighter side of the genre to dabble in, though probably more fun if you’ve sampled a few of the more serious films first.
  • Firestorm Should Be Good

    Obviously plenty of people have come here via Comics Should Be Good, so some people have already read this, but others can go and read my guest piece on John Ostrander’s Firestorm that I did last week. Ripoff of Superman IV and Swamp Thing, or sister-title to Suicide Squad and prelude to Spectre? You decide.

    (Actually, no, you don’t get to decide. My judgment is fairly authoritative.)

  • Doctor Thirteen is Such a Schmuck

    I picked up DC’s Phantom Stranger Showcase a couple weeks ago, and it’s a pretty entertaining read. It can be pretty hokey, and you’re obviously not meant to read more than one or two stories in one sitting, but it’s still fun: The Phantom Stranger is a cool character, and there are some nifty Neal Adams covers. It also features one of the biggest losers in comic book history: Doctor Thirteen.

    He means well. He tries to protect people from sham artists and con men trying to cash in on fear and superstition. But this naturally sets him against the totally mysterious and mystical Phantom Stranger — though they always seem to team up reluctantly in the end — and he just can’t win.

    Doctor Thirteen, of course, is a guest-star in The Phantom Stranger. He’s not appearing in That Guy Who Pretends to be a Phantom But is Just a Janitor with a Smoke Machine. Granted, the Stranger isn’t a totally out-there spook – most of the time, he’s just mysterious. But the whole point of the book being The Phantom Stranger and not Scooby Doo is that there are mystical, magical menaces out there.


    Consequently, Doctor Thirteen, rational fanatic as he is, ends up looking like a complete ninny as he tries to explain away the obviously magical stuff that’s always going on. It would be one thing if he were some sort of lame villain or foil, but he’s actually a good guy, part of a crime-fighting odd couple. He’s just a really, really lame one.

    Is it too much to ask him to mellow out? To adjust his position just a little bit, so that maybe most supernatural occurrences are frauds (the Phantom Stranger exposes frauds too), but accepting that there actually are freaky, unexplainable, supernatural things out there? Like, say, the star of the book?


    I suppose it is.

  • I never thought it would come to this

    This weekend, I did something I never thought I could do.

    I threw out some comics. To be entirely accurate, I recycled them, as I am an environmentally concious sort. But it still feels like I’ve done something wrong.

    I am, by nature, something of a packrat. I don’t throw things out unless I’m absolutely certain I’ll never need it again, or if it’s taking up too much space. Consequently, I often walk around with a wallet full of old movie tickets, receipts, and expired coupons, and my apartment is full of dubiously organized newspapers, magazines, more receipts, and flyers I never got around to throwing out. And, much to the chagrin of my girlfriend, lots and lots of comics sitting about in boxes and random piles.

    Most of them are still there, of course. But I found a bunch of stuff that I’m never going to read again: Books that were cool for a week or two after they came out, or were issues I picked up to sample. Plenty of first issues and new storylines. Some of them are actively sucky, while others are just unmemorable. They’re mostly pretty scattered, rarely more than one or two consecutive issues of a series, and aren’t worth nearly enough to go to the trouble of selling them off on eBay. Most of them aren’t appropriate, or interesting enough, for donating to a children’s hospital or something.

    Throwing out comics seems even more egregious than throwing out other random crap, but I’m not sure why. Obviously the collector mentality hangs off many readers, telling us that these are valuable items and should be preserved and protected. But as anyone who read comics in the 90s knows, that’s pretty much crap; 99.9% of the books I own have no value beyond that which I assign them. I’ve long since given up bagging and boarding, aside from the highlights of my library. Books I want to re-read long-term are usually in trade format when it’s available.

    So this is perhaps the final farewell to any last vestiges of the collector mindset that may have been hanging on. Yeah, I’m throwing out comics. So what? They’re only paper.

  • Madman’s Groovy Comeback

    After a far-too-long absence, Mike Allred’s Madman is returning, moving to Image, and the entire series to this point is being collected in an 852-page omnibus.

    Granted, that $125.00 cover price is pretty high, but not too high for one of the best superhero comics ever published. Not that many newbies will be likely to experiment with that price tag, but if you love superheroes, you should read Madman. This is on my must-buy list, even if I have most of the Dark Horse series in single-issue form.